Hi Carl, Did you document on the steps to avoid the dependency issues?
Thanks, Mathius Carl Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes of course. I was under the impression - as you probably noticed - that the UserLogin entity was in the Party application. Basically what I am wondering then is if I can use the framework alone to manage permissions and logins in a secure way. The way you always do in the other apps. David E Jones wrote: > > > On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:24 AM, Carl Johansson wrote: > >> >> I have tried naked 4.0 and it works well for me. However it would >> be great to >> have partymgr and securityext for logins. Am I wrong about this? If >> not, is >> anyone else interested in this aswell? > > Could you be more specific about what you have in mind? The UserLogin > entity is in the framework and should work fine without the party and > securityext components. > > If you want the partymgr you're opening a whole can of worms, as > there is a lot in it and it isn't designed to be used independent of > the other applications components. It can certainly be isolated, but > I'd be very surprised if it was worth the effort. > > -David > > >> David E Jones wrote: >>> >>> >>> Just delete the entire applications folder (and you can delete the >>> specialpurpose folder as well). >>> >>> I haven't tested this in a while, but it should still work without >>> problems unless a new framework -> applications dependency has >>> slipped in (which is a big NO NO!). >>> >>> -David >>> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-an-application-from-ofbiz-webtools-tf4672472.html#a13359349 Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
