I think we will use the SVN revision for that.
2009/2/22 BJ Freeman <bjf...@free-man.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > interesting. so how do you denote a minor release or update? > > Bruno Busco sent the following on 2/22/2009 3:35 AM: >> Sorry, >> I did not understand your real question. >> >> We have decided to use a release numbering scheme similar to UBUNTU. >> 9.3 means March 2009 >> >> -Bruno >> >> 2009/2/22 BJ Freeman <bjf...@free-man.net>: >> so why did ofbiz jump from 4.0 to 9.3? >> >> Bruno Busco sent the following on 2/22/2009 2:59 AM: >>>>> Well, >>>>> the unresolved issues scheduled for 9.3 are: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310500&fixfor=12313602&resolution=-1&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC >>>>> >>>>> OFBIZ-2133 has a patch ready and is actually waiting for a review. >>>>> >>>>> -Bruno >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2009/2/22 BJ Freeman <bjf...@free-man.net>: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310500&fixfor=12313602 >>>>> it say release Branch 9.3 >>>>> so no 5,6,7, or 8 >>> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFJoTsArP3NbaWWqE4RAnAJAJwL2QBJ5qohvu0DQGY1vKErTrZsQQCfYO3V > R5s/zYI6xl/TJWO7Q4oOAZg= > =Zgcv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >