ofbiz is able to support anything if someone once to put the time into doing it. That said, minilang, is geared to the entities so is really a shortcut language to manipulate data. I see no difference in XML and C##, for Basic, or php. if someone had no proficiency in one of them, the one they are use to is easier
Christopher Snow sent the following on 2/22/2010 6:58 AM: > Hi Jacques, minilang is quick, but being xml it's verbose. Groovy > would be much more concise wouldn't it - especially if a DSL was created? > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> For the same reason Java is not used. Once you get a grasp on it you >> understand why it's there: productivity. >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Mini-Language+Guide#Mini-LanguageGuide-introduction >> >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Christopher Snow" <sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk> >>> I was wondering why groovy is not used for service code instead on >>> minilang? >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> >>> Chris >>> >> > >
