Thanks Sebastian, I'll double-check It was ok during my test, maybe will ask for the steps
WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Jan 24, 2017 04:02, "seba.wag...@gmail.com" <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Maxim, good work! I have seen some improvements/simplifications on the User-list. Less buttons. I think that is the right approach. Simpler user interface is better. But I noticed that a bit of work is required in the Audio/Video settings. It works initially, but if you try to refresh (via the small icon in the video pod) or via triggering the modal/dialogue to choose different device settings via the user-list the video just becomes black and nothing happens anymore. Not possible to recover unless complete refresh of the browser. I think that flow requires some attention. Audio/Video settings is pretty much our core functionality. Cheers, Seb 2017-01-24 0:53 GMT+13:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>: > Hi Dimitriy, > > node.js for server-side js is a huge package that need to handled > somehow... I also don't know if this would be the best solution... > > webRTC browser2browser will not scale for private user and their > dsl-connection. So webRTC or SIP/RTMP to a mediaserver that then multicasts > to all peers sounds like a way to move away from flash... I think this is > already discussed. > > Anyway I have no experience in this area and I was wondering that this guy > mentions a "simple solution". > > Greetings Peter > > > > > Am 23.01.2017 um 11:58 schrieb Dmitriy -: > > Hello Peter, > > I'm working on webRTC native client that can accept peer connection from > browser. > We already have "serverlessmedia" solution "browser - to - browser" with > our signal server in Java. > > We're moving to "*peer*-to-*media server*-to-*all other peers*" solution. > > >> Do you know this guy? > >> https://github.com/muaz-khan > > Yeah, I know him, and even have tried to use his library recordRTC. > Unfortunately, It allows to capture media stream ("live video") only in > Chrome. Firefox just produces only one big chunk, IE/Edge doesn't support > video etc. > I tried many times to use pure JavaScript solution but libraries not ready > for this purposes (MediaRecorder API and MediaSources API) yet and also our > stack of technology doesn't permit to use JavaScript on the server side. > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: > >> I had a look around... >> >> I found this one... >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20056683/webrtc-multicast-one-to-many >> >> and the "simple solution can be peer-to-server model (*peer*-to-*media >> server*-to-*all other peers*)." >> >> Do you know this guy? >> https://github.com/muaz-khan >> >> Greetings Peter >> >> >> Am 23.01.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Peter Dähn: >> >> I thought the same about the general roadmap >> >> 1st whiteborad (there was something in gsoc, right?) >> 2nd audio/video (also gsoc but not finally prototyped) >> >> Lets have a look, if we could get some input (and feedback!) from such >> whish-list... >> >> Am 23.01.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >> >> Wish list is good idea :) >> I guess it can be created from the list of JIRA issues, then discussed :) >> >> My plans were to perform next steps to remove Flash :), >> 1) move WB to HTML5 >> 2) move Audio/Video ... >> last one seems to be tricky :( no POC yet :( >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Peter Dähn < <da...@vcrp.de> >> da...@vcrp.de> wrote: >> >>> nothing critical, rooms are working so far... >>> >>> We will collect a few things regarding usability and look and feel. >>> Unfortunatly by now no time is left... I think we will report this using >>> Jira... >>> >>> btw.. Is there a kind of wish-list to discuss new features/wishes and >>> probably get a ranking of things to implement or improve? >>> >>> Greetings Peter >>> >>> >>> Am 23.01.2017 um 05:29 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>> >>> If no critical issues will be reported, I plan to pack RC1 on Wednesday >>> Thanks for participating :) >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>> <solomax...@gmail.com>solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Or maybe even better to correct <http://openmeetings> >>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and-branding.html (Configuration >>>> -> User Interface -> Themes) >>>> And add section .... >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>> <solomax...@gmail.com>solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I can add the page to >>>>> <http://openmeetings.apache.org/>http://openmeetings.apache.org/ >>>>> >>>>> Configuration -> Customization -> Styling >>>>> >>>>> What do you think would it be OK? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Peter Dähn < <da...@vcrp.de> >>>>> da...@vcrp.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ok... is this Info somewhere? Maybe it is enough to write it down in >>>>>> the documentation... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 20.01.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>>>>> >>>>>> To provide custom styling/layout you can modify existing css files >>>>>> .... >>>>>> I can create empty "custom.css" and will add it to be included last, >>>>>> but I see not much sense in it .... >>>>>> >>>>>> and you can do it as follows: >>>>>> 1) create webapps/openmeetings/css/custom.css file >>>>>> 2) open >>>>>> webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/openmeetings/web/pages/BasePage.html >>>>>> add link to your new CSS file >>>>>> >>>>>> something like this :) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Peter Dähn < <da...@vcrp.de> >>>>>> da...@vcrp.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> one more thing: is it possible to provide a custom.css file to >>>>>>> provide custom layout somehow? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 19.01.2017 um 06:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I believe 3.2.0 should be released, I'm going to implement >>>>>>> <https://issues.apach>https://issues.apach >>>>>>> e.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1527 and would like to pack RC1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any critical issues. >>>>>>> (you can use our demo for tests: <https://om>https://om >>>>>>> .alteametasoft.com:8443/next) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And IMHO we need to switch main stable development branch to 3.2.x >>>>>>> 3.1.5 can be released in a week or so with some critical REST/SOAP >>>>>>> fixes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> WBR >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> WBR >>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Dmitry Bezheckov. > > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock seba.wag...@gmail.com
