Hello All, I'm almost ready to start 3.2.0 release process, Any "last minute" issues? :)))
Another question: Is it OK to drop 3.1.x support? i.e. 3.1.5 will be the last 3.1.x release On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the report Sebastian! > I was able to reproduce and fix this issue > demo is updated > > please let me know if anything else is broken ... > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Sebastian, > > I'll double-check > > It was ok during my test, maybe will ask for the steps > > > > WBR, Maxim > > (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > > > > On Jan 24, 2017 04:02, "seba.wag...@gmail.com" <seba.wag...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Maxim, > > > > good work! I have seen some improvements/simplifications on the > User-list. > > Less buttons. I think that is the right approach. Simpler user interface > is > > better. > > > > But I noticed that a bit of work is required in the Audio/Video > settings. It > > works initially, but if you try to refresh (via the small icon in the > video > > pod) or via triggering the modal/dialogue to choose different device > > settings via the user-list the video just becomes black and nothing > happens > > anymore. Not possible to recover unless complete refresh of the browser. > > > > I think that flow requires some attention. Audio/Video settings is pretty > > much our core functionality. > > > > Cheers, > > Seb > > > > > > 2017-01-24 0:53 GMT+13:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>: > >> > >> Hi Dimitriy, > >> > >> node.js for server-side js is a huge package that need to handled > >> somehow... I also don't know if this would be the best solution... > >> > >> webRTC browser2browser will not scale for private user and their > >> dsl-connection. So webRTC or SIP/RTMP to a mediaserver that then > multicasts > >> to all peers sounds like a way to move away from flash... I think this > is > >> already discussed. > >> > >> Anyway I have no experience in this area and I was wondering that this > guy > >> mentions a "simple solution". > >> > >> Greetings Peter > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Am 23.01.2017 um 11:58 schrieb Dmitriy -: > >> > >> Hello Peter, > >> > >> I'm working on webRTC native client that can accept peer connection from > >> browser. > >> We already have "serverlessmedia" solution "browser - to - browser" with > >> our signal server in Java. > >> > >> We're moving to "peer-to-media server-to-all other peers" solution. > >> > >> >> Do you know this guy? > >> >> https://github.com/muaz-khan > >> > >> Yeah, I know him, and even have tried to use his library recordRTC. > >> Unfortunately, It allows to capture media stream ("live video") only in > >> Chrome. Firefox just produces only one big chunk, IE/Edge doesn't > support > >> video etc. > >> I tried many times to use pure JavaScript solution but libraries not > ready > >> for this purposes (MediaRecorder API and MediaSources API) yet and also > our > >> stack of technology doesn't permit to use JavaScript on the server side. > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: > >>> > >>> I had a look around... > >>> > >>> I found this one... > >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20056683/webrtc- > multicast-one-to-many > >>> > >>> and the "simple solution can be peer-to-server model (peer-to-media > >>> server-to-all other peers)." > >>> > >>> Do you know this guy? > >>> https://github.com/muaz-khan > >>> > >>> Greetings Peter > >>> > >>> > >>> Am 23.01.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Peter Dähn: > >>> > >>> I thought the same about the general roadmap > >>> > >>> 1st whiteborad (there was something in gsoc, right?) > >>> 2nd audio/video (also gsoc but not finally prototyped) > >>> > >>> Lets have a look, if we could get some input (and feedback!) from such > >>> whish-list... > >>> > >>> Am 23.01.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >>> > >>> Wish list is good idea :) > >>> I guess it can be created from the list of JIRA issues, then discussed > :) > >>> > >>> My plans were to perform next steps to remove Flash :), > >>> 1) move WB to HTML5 > >>> 2) move Audio/Video ... > >>> last one seems to be tricky :( no POC yet :( > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> nothing critical, rooms are working so far... > >>>> > >>>> We will collect a few things regarding usability and look and feel. > >>>> Unfortunatly by now no time is left... I think we will report this > using > >>>> Jira... > >>>> > >>>> btw.. Is there a kind of wish-list to discuss new features/wishes and > >>>> probably get a ranking of things to implement or improve? > >>>> > >>>> Greetings Peter > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Am 23.01.2017 um 05:29 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >>>> > >>>> If no critical issues will be reported, I plan to pack RC1 on > Wednesday > >>>> Thanks for participating :) > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Maxim Solodovnik > >>>> <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Or maybe even better to correct > >>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and-branding.html > (Configuration -> > >>>>> User Interface -> Themes) > >>>>> And add section .... > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik > >>>>> <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I can add the page to > >>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Configuration -> Customization -> Styling > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do you think would it be OK? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ok... is this Info somewhere? Maybe it is enough to write it down > in > >>>>>>> the documentation... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Am 20.01.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> To provide custom styling/layout you can modify existing css files > >>>>>>> .... > >>>>>>> I can create empty "custom.css" and will add it to be included > last, > >>>>>>> but I see not much sense in it .... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> and you can do it as follows: > >>>>>>> 1) create webapps/openmeetings/css/custom.css file > >>>>>>> 2) open > >>>>>>> webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/ > openmeetings/web/pages/BasePage.html > >>>>>>> add link to your new CSS file > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> something like this :) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> one more thing: is it possible to provide a custom.css file to > >>>>>>>> provide custom layout somehow? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Am 19.01.2017 um 06:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hello All, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I believe 3.2.0 should be released, I'm going to implement > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1527 and > would like to > >>>>>>>> pack RC1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any critical issues. > >>>>>>>> (you can use our demo for tests: > >>>>>>>> https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And IMHO we need to switch main stable development branch to 3.2.x > >>>>>>>> 3.1.5 can be released in a week or so with some critical REST/SOAP > >>>>>>>> fixes > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> WDYT? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> WBR > >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> WBR > >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> WBR > >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> WBR > >>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> WBR > >>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> WBR > >>> Maxim aka solomax > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Dmitry Bezheckov. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sebastian Wagner > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
