1 presenter and 49 viewers will generate 50x traffic The actual bandwidth depends on video stream size, quality and "dynamic" (I believe more or less static picture should consume less bandwidth, but I haven't checked)
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 13:35, Rohrbach, Gerald <g.rohrb...@funkegruppe.de> wrote: > Sebastian, > > > > unfortunately we have only up to 10 users in one room. > > We are using only for internal communication and the server is in intranet > only. > > > > We are using nearly the latest snapshot. > > I have tried a machine in DMZ with coturn but running on some issues, > where in the moment not the > > time is to look in detail. In general it works, issues are from our > internal network. > > > > We have a second physical machine with OM direct connected to internet, > for some special cases with > > Externals. > > > > My technical question is, if we have 50 users connected from outside and > just one presenter is sharing his video > > do we then need 50 times of the bandwidth or just one time? > > I would think that it is not 1 stream but 50. > > > > We have currently only 100Mbit/100Mbit link, but we need to keep an eye on > the used bandwidth in the moment. So if the bandwidth needed for large > meetings is high one of the solution is to use > > a machine from a provider. > > > > > > Gerald > > > > > > > > *Von:* seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com] > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 14. Mai 2020 06:36 > *An:* Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org> > *Betreff:* Re: [DISCUSSION] next release > > > > Yeah that would be great if we have some users that can provide some > testing feedback with larger audiences. > > > > We had some Universities in the past that could run some tests for us. > > > > Thanks, > > Seb > > > Sebastian Wagner > > Director Arrakeen Solutions > > http://arrakeen-solutions.co.nz/ > > > <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/da4e8828-743d-4968-af6f-49033f10d60a/public_url> > <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/b7e709c6-aa87-4b02-9faf-099038475e36/public_url> > > > > > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 14:59, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello Sebastian, > > > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 06:03, seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > How are we doing in terms of Load Testing ? > > > > Well I see no way to test heavy load at one machine > > Here are some number for KMS: https://testrtc.com/sessions-kurento-server/ > > > > I had plans to re-implement external video functionality > > this might allow as to test room load with multiple streams > > but I believe this is not real-world scenario > > > > my laptop can handle ~20-30 simultaneous tabs, not 100 .... > > > > > > I don't mind so much feature completeness or 100% replicating what was in > 4.x. > > > > But I am mindful of the backlash in terms of being production ready if we > have issues in scaling up to 100+ concurrent users. > > > > Do we have any positive results/feedback/scenarios on that ? > > Can we do anything to de-risk this and confirm we are ready for production > ? > > > > Are there any users on this list that can help us and that can run a low > risk scenario with 100+ users in a presentation conference room ? > > > > Peter has published numbers for 4.x > > Maybe he can share numbers for 5.0 if it will be stable enough :) > > > > > > Thanks, > > Seb > > > Sebastian Wagner > > Director Arrakeen Solutions > > http://arrakeen-solutions.co.nz/ > > > <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/da4e8828-743d-4968-af6f-49033f10d60a/public_url> > <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/b7e709c6-aa87-4b02-9faf-099038475e36/public_url> > > > > > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:55, K. Kamhamea <kamha...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Please can someone explain? > > I understand that SIP has something to do with IP telephones, but what > does that mean to OM functionality? > > Best K. > > > > Am Mi., 13. Mai 2020 um 18:15 Uhr schrieb R. Scholz < > rene.sch...@abakus-edv-systems.de>: > > Hello Maxim, > > at this moment two things are important for me: > - calling a room directly with room-name > - SIP-support > > Best regards, > > René > > Am 13.05.2020 um 17:59 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > > > > On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 22:55, Rohrbach, Gerald <g.rohrb...@funkegruppe.de> > wrote: > > Maxim, > > > > cool, you are coming forward… > > > > > > SIP Next Release means 6.0.0? > > > > This need to be discussed separately, but I would say 5.1.0 :) > > > > > > > > Gerald > > > > *Von:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2020 17:47 > *An:* Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org> > *Betreff:* [DISCUSSION] next release > > > > Hello All, > > > > Today I've noticed we already addressed 41 issue for M5 > > I would like to perform next release as soon as current `master` will be > even more stable > > And release it as "5.0.0" (NOT 5.0.0-M5) > > > > I plan to include > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2297 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2236 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2217 > > > > to upcoming release as well > > > > there is no ETA yet due to > > 1) we still have reports regarding stability > > 2) we are waiting for Apache Wicket release > > > > please let me know if you see other blockers :) > > > > SIP most probably will go to the next release > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Maxim > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Maxim > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Maxim > > -- Best regards, Maxim
