On Fri, March 18, 2005 10:42 am, Rick Reumann said: > No, you are correct and sorry for the confusion.
No worries mate! :) > Yes there is some over head if you have to forward to the setup of > another action (vs going right to the JSP), but to me that's a small > price to pay for having a clean consistent way of doing things - (All > entries to X page go through X DispatchAction or even X SetUpAction if > you hate the Dispatch). I tend to agree the overhead isn't a huge concern in a great many instances. It's when you start talking about very high availability and scalability requirements that every little bit counts. Obviously you can always throw hardware at things like this and render moot any debate about whether an extra request here or there matters. And while I agree with you that what you suggest really isn't all that ugly, if there is a solution that is even a little cleaner (a subjective debate to be sure) *as well as* avoids that overhead, it's worth discussing. :) > Rick Frank --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
