On 7/13/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> Showing side by side examples from
> >> Struts "classic",
> >> Struts-EL + JSTL 1.0, and
> >> Struts + JSP 2.0 + JSTL 1.1
> >> is on my TODO list
>
> > Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
> > is not possible?
>
> (Is this a trick question?)
No, it is not a trick question. I just started with JSTL. I used only
Struts tags before.
> Sure, it's possible. It's going to make some
> things harder than they need to be, such as...
>
> <c:forEach items="${accountForm.map['accounts']}" var="acct" >
> <html-el:multibox property="accounts" value="${acct}"/>
> </c:forEach>
>
> And using Struts-EL will force you into the recommended practice of using
> the JSTL tags whenever possible, because the Struts tags with JSTL
> equivalents were intentionally left out.
<html-el> is Struts-EL tag, is not it? I would prefer to use JSTL
only. I think I can do that. But it this case, what Struts-EL is for?
For convenience only?
Michael.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
