Nice article. that explains why google save sites the way it is.

So all pages that will not be changed should have no .php, .asp, at most
.html/.shtml. Only dynamically changing pages should use .php, .asp or
.jsp.

John H. Xu

http://www.usanalyst.com
http://www.GetusJobs.com (The largest free job portal in North America)

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Jeff Beal"
  To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
  Subject: Re: JSF is the beginning of the end of Struts !!!
  Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:23:55 -0400

  >
  > In Tim Berners-Lee's defense, the URI without '.html' works. The
  link
  > from Google included the '.html', and I didn't notice it when I
  pasted
  > into the email. It's Google's fault!
  >
  > http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
  >
  > -- Jeff
  >
  > On 7/29/05, Marsh-Bourdon, Christopher
  > wrote:
  > > It is vaguely amusing that the page's url dos not adhere to the
  page's
  > > content!
  > >
  > > Not sure how practical it would be to use url that do not contain
  an (file)
  > > extension with Struts or most web app frameworks. Aren't they
  there to give
  > > guidance to their content (Hacker subterfuge excluded)?
  > >
  > > It shouldn't detract from the idea of page "longevity", which
  would make a
  > > for a better web.
  > >
  > > Christopher Marsh-Bourdon
  > > www.marsh-bourdon.com
  > >
  > >
  > > -----Original Message-----
  > > From: Jeff Beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > > Sent: 29 July 2005 13:55
  > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
  > > Subject: Re: JSF is the beginning of the end of Struts !!!
  > >
  > > Imagine a company currently using PHP who decides their app has
  grown past
  > > the constraints of PHP. It would be silly of them to change the
  file
  > > extension on their URIs just because they're changing technology,
  so they
  > > just map *.php to the Struts Servlet.
  > >
  > > Of course, if the web developers at that company were really
  smart, they'd
  > > have been following the guidelines described in
  > > http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html and wouldn't have such
  a problem.
  > > Few people do this, though.
  > >
  > > -- Jeff
  > >
  > > On 7/28/05, John Henry Xu wrote:
  > > > I mapped to .html but not .asp, and I doubt many people would
  map java
  > > > apps to .php, .asp or .aspx in hosting companies (Of course u
  can
  > > > technically but I can not see the benefit). That's why I assume
  if I
  > > > see .php, I know it is php site with 99% confidence.
  > > >
  > > > The reason for our mapping to html was that this page is rather
  stable
  > > > and I don't change their contents over time (in general). And
  for
  > > > security reason as Stéphane said. For PHP and perl it is very
  simple
  > > > to do that. For java it is a little more difficult but
  manageable. It
  > > > can give you more URL addresses as Neil said.
  > > >
  > > > As for jsf, is it .jspx? or maybe mapping to others? It is
  possible
  > > > jsf maps to html. jsf using .aspx? It is unthinkable even
  technically
  > > > possible.
  > > >
  > > > John H. Xu
  > > >
  > > > ----- Original Message -----
  > > > From: "Neil Erdwien"
  > > > To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
  > > > Subject: Re: JSF is the beginning of the end of Struts !!!
  > > > Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:01:29 -0500
  > > >
  > > > >
  > > > > I presume preserving URLs is the reason to map one
  technology's
  > > > > default extention to another. For example, if you have a
  static
  > > > > web site with files than end in .html, and switch to
  Java/Struts,
  > > > > then you can map *.html to the Struts' action servlet.
  > > > >
  > > > > The end users' bookmarks don't have to change, but you're
  really
  > > > > running a Struts action under the covers.
  > > > >
  > > > >
  > > > > Stéphane Zuckerman wrote:
  > > > > > John Henry Xu a écrit :
  > > > > >
  > > > > >>>> Actually, my favorite sites are the
  > > > > >>>
  > > > > >>>
  > > > > >>> ones that map "*.asp" to the Struts servlet. Gotta love
  people
  > > > that
  > > > > >>> bend minds like that!
  > > > > >>
  > > > > >>
  > > > > >>
  > > > > >>
  > > > > >> I cannot imagine what motivates people tried to map there
  > > > servlets to
  > > > > >> .asp. Even I could easily map my site to .aspx, I would
  not do
  > > > that.
  > > > > >> Although I respect MS, I am not really a huge fun of
  Microsoft.
  > > > If I
  > > > > >> implement sites with Java, I want java take credits. If I
  > > > implement sites
  > > > > >> in PHP, I want PHP take credits, I would not map that to
  .asp.
  > > > If I use
  > > > > >> .net, I don't map it to jsp also. If I saw a site ends
  with .php
  > > > or
  > > > > >> .aspx, I assume that was a php and .net site, and I
  belieave I
  > > > am right
  > > > > >> on that with 99% confidence.
  > > > > >
  > > > > >
  > > > > > I guess this is against wannabe crackers. Yes, yes, I know,
  > > > security
  > > > > > through obscurity, blah blah blah... Well, once you've done
  > > > everything
  > > > > > that isn't obfuscation-related, there is only obscurity
  that
  > > > remains,
  > > > > > and frankly, it does help gain a few {minutes,hours} before
  the
  > > > nasty
  > > > > > black hats break the server. :-)
  > > > > >
  > > > >
  > > > > -- Neil Erdwien, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web Technologies Manager
  > > > > Computing and Network Services, Kansas State University
  > > > >
  > > > >
  > > >
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > John H. Xu
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > http://www.usanalyst.com
  > > >
  > > > http://www.GetusJobs.com (The largest free job portal in North
  > > > America)
  > > >
  > > > --
  > > > ___________________________________________________________
  > > > Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
  > > > http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > >
  > >
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > > ------
  > >
  > >
  > >
  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  > > The information contained herein is confidential and is intended
  > > solely for the
  > > addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the
  express
  > > written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended
  > > recipient, please
  > > contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44
  > > (0)20 7623 8000, or
  > > via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or
  > > wish to read our
  > > e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer
  to
  > > http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. 3166
  > >
  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  > >
  > >
  > >
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > >
  > >
  >
  >
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Jack H. Xu
Technology columnist and editor

http://www.usanalyst.com

http://www.getusjobs.com (The largest free job portal in North America)

-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

Reply via email to