> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Christopher Marsh-Bourdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 8. August 2005 23:05 > An: Struts Users Mailing List > Betreff: Re: [OT] JSP Clutter > > The anti-Struts/MVC argument, and it isn't mine, is that > whereas Tapestry and JSF will generate the HTML/JSP, with > Struts it has to be written and maintained. Now I haven't > spent that much time with either Tapestry or JSF, but from > what little I have read; it would appear that they can > generate the HTML/JSP it without the need for it to be > directly written (in HTML etc). That seems to be the gist of it.
It's funny :-) So you think you take Tapestry or Shale, and your site comes out by magic? I am sorry, but even, if Graig himself would come to your office and snip with his fingers, it wouldn't be enough to YOUR HTML of YOUR SITE appear by magic. Whichever framework you choose, none of them will know, that your site is in red on black background with blue drop down lists in Verdana 8px. If you find one, tell me, it would probably save me 30-50% of project time, and make about 10.000 html producers world wide unemployed :-) Regards Leon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
