Jonathan Revusky wrote: > I have no recollection of having wronged you in any specific way.
You sprayed then, you spray now. No change. "They" told me not to feed the trolls then, they tell me not to feed the trolls now. >> I really don't believe we're so far apart on this: I think the bar for >> commiting to Struts is too high as well. At the same time, I would >> definitely _not_ give commit rights to anybody that asked for them, and >> the project would be better off for it. > How do you know for sure? Has this hypothesis ever been tested? Not on Struts, as I have essentially zero say on how it's run. But on other projects, yes: opening projects has, in my experience, led to lower quality and/or too much overhead in keeping the quality high. YMMV, of course, and hopefully other folks haven't had to deal with the messes I have--and those were messes generally internal to a company (albeit pretty large ones). Mind you I don't claim that having easier access to commit rights is a bad idea; I just think it has to be monitored more closely than I've had time to deal with in the past. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
