I flat don't believe this. Who, what, where, when, etc? On 3/23/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jonathan Revusky wrote: > > I have no recollection of having wronged you in any specific way. > > You sprayed then, you spray now. No change. "They" told me not to feed > the trolls then, they tell me not to feed the trolls now. > > >> I really don't believe we're so far apart on this: I think the bar for > >> commiting to Struts is too high as well. At the same time, I would > >> definitely _not_ give commit rights to anybody that asked for them, and > >> the project would be better off for it. > > How do you know for sure? Has this hypothesis ever been tested? > > Not on Struts, as I have essentially zero say on how it's run. > > But on other projects, yes: opening projects has, in my experience, led > to lower quality and/or too much overhead in keeping the quality high. > YMMV, of course, and hopefully other folks haven't had to deal with the > messes I have--and those were messes generally internal to a company > (albeit pretty large ones). > > Mind you I don't claim that having easier access to commit rights is a > bad idea; I just think it has to be monitored more closely than I've had > time to deal with in the past. > > Dave > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
