Pros: Easy to learn and start with (some free books available.) Great community (mailing list.) Very extensible.
Cons: Sporadic releases. Javascript validation framework is very limited for non ajax apps. Multiple rendering technologies make their component model hard to modify or extends (parallel class hierarchies for both components and tags, and component's HTML code and styles are tied to a particular theme.) 2008/11/7 Néstor Boscán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Ryan > > In my experience: > > Pros: > > 1.- Form mapping!!!. Yes form mapping in Struts 1 is horrible. > 2.- Conversion support > 3.- Interceptor support > 4.- Better AJAX Support > 5.- Lightweight vs JSF > > The framework is very flexible and you can adjust it to your needs. > > Cons: > > 1.- Themes. They make the framework harder to understand and slower, and to > me adds little value. > 2.- Validation is OK, but need better validation support like validation of > list items. And the ability to validate a specific Action method in a > straightforward way. Better JavaScript support. > 3.- Struts 2 Tags should be more flexible. > So there it is. > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:18 PM, ryan webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Can anyone share to me some of the things you like about >> Struts 2 as well some of the things you don't like about struts 2? >> >> Thanks! >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
