1.- Themes. They make the framework harder to understand and slower, and to me adds little value. MG>How would you differentiate between ajax and simple themed controls?
2.- Validation is OK, but need better validation support like validation of list items. And the ability to validate a specific Action method in a straightforward way. Better JavaScript support. MG>if Dojo supports validation Struts 2 can incorporate that JS Validation routine in the ftl 3.- Struts 2 Tags should be more flexible. MG>Flexible? How? Thanks, Martin ______________________________________________ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. > Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:52:45 +0800 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: Re: What are Pros and Cons for Struts 2? > > Thanks to all replies! I really appreciated all replies all are really > helpful and informative. > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Gabriel Belingueres > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Pros: > > Easy to learn and start with (some free books available.) > > Great community (mailing list.) > > Very extensible. > > > > Cons: > > Sporadic releases. > > Javascript validation framework is very limited for non ajax apps. > > Multiple rendering technologies make their component model hard to > > modify or extends (parallel class hierarchies for both components and > > tags, and component's HTML code and styles are tied to a particular > > theme.) > > > > 2008/11/7 Néstor Boscán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi Ryan > > > > > > In my experience: > > > > > > Pros: > > > > > > 1.- Form mapping!!!. Yes form mapping in Struts 1 is horrible. > > > 2.- Conversion support > > > 3.- Interceptor support > > > 4.- Better AJAX Support > > > 5.- Lightweight vs JSF > > > > > > The framework is very flexible and you can adjust it to your needs. > > > > > > Cons: > > > > > > 1.- Themes. They make the framework harder to understand and slower, and > > to > > > me adds little value. > > > 2.- Validation is OK, but need better validation support like validation > > of > > > list items. And the ability to validate a specific Action method in a > > > straightforward way. Better JavaScript support. > > > 3.- Struts 2 Tags should be more flexible. > > > So there it is. > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:18 PM, ryan webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Can anyone share to me some of the things you like about > > >> Struts 2 as well some of the things you don't like about struts 2? > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > warmest regards, > Ryan Webb - Philippines > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ Get 5 GB of storage with Windows Live Hotmail. http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_5gb_112008
