Hi Stefano, This looks like an awkward design as you would go through half the interceptor stack expecting to call one action, and half the stack expecting to call a second action.
As an alternative could you do something like the following:- Create class (or Interface) ReceivingAction with sub classes as the "actions" you want to assign dynamically. Create a true action class ForwardingAction with a property ReceivingAction. The interceptor can now dynamically create the class required (derived from / implementing ReceivingAction) and set it on the current action (ForwardingAction). It could also place the ReceivingAction instance on the ValueStack. The main action methods you are interested in (e.g. execute) could simply forward to the ReceivingAction instance. You will need to be careful about interceptor order if you want to do things like set your parameter values on your ReceivingAction. I haven't implemented this myself, although I have implemented all the techniques I have described. I'm fairly confident that this will achieve what you want. Cheers, Steve -----Original Message----- From: Stefano Corallo [mailto:stefan...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 May 2009 07:54 To: user@struts.apache.org Subject: Struts2 Interceptor Hi all, can an interceptor call an arbitraty action different from the action requested by the client? Suppose i've the interceptor "interceptor-router" placed in the stack and the client call MyAction.action, when the interceptor intercept the call is possible to 'redirect' the call to MyDifferentAction.action from the interceptor? I've seen that there is action chaining but this require to know at build time the name of the actions i want to redirect to, but i know the name only at runtime and I hope i was clear :) sorry for my english. -- Stefano Corallo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org