This is now fixed in the lasted svn - there was a few things needed
tidying up on the broker side too
thanks,
Rob
On Oct 4, 2007, at 3:26 AM, WHIRLYCOTT wrote:
Rob, thanks for looking into this. I'll provide a summary of what
I found here for anybody out there doing searches who might run
across this issue:
Basically, if you create several (or many) connection objects, you
end up with these threads piling up in the background. I've also
experienced this same problem with the connection pool supplied
with ActiveMQ.
What I've done for my producers is to only have one connection
object per application lifecycle. This already seems to be working
fine for me. It's not intuitive and, as Rob has confirmed, there's
definitely a problem with AMQ that he is still fixing.
Thanks again.
phil.
On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
er - kinda fixed - there's another leak just need to plug ...
On Oct 2, 2007, at 1:23 PM, WHIRLYCOTT wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
I'm going to see if I can reproduce on OS/X
Any luck?
phil.
--
Whirlycott
Philip Jacob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/
--
Whirlycott
Philip Jacob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/