I will examine this option today. Thanks for the heads up. Jonathan Share wrote: > > Hellweek wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I know what I am about to post will upset a few people, however I think >> it >> is important that I document my experience with ActiveMQ in the hopes >> that >> others like me can have an understanding of the issues that you will >> face. >> >> A little history. >> >> I am not new to Open Source projects, have been involved in them and have >> sponsored the use of open source for many years. >> >> I have been working with various message brokers for a few years. My >> first >> experience was with TIBCO EMS. Needless to say I was very impressed with >> the stability and functionality of this fine EMS. Next I had the >> opportunity to work with Sonic EMS. Again I was impressed with this >> product >> and was even happier with its low cost of ownership. >> >> Over the last 6 weeks it has been my job to evaluate for our Trading firm >> an >> internal messaging system. We wanted to use a EMS solution for >> dissemination of pricing data to our in-house applications as well as >> external clients of ours. The messaging systems we are evaluating. >> TIBCO >> EMS, MSMQ 3.0, SONIC EMS, ACTIVEMQ 4.1.1 or ActieMQ 5.0. >> >> How did each product fair? >> 1. Tibco EMS no issues with any of the stress tests and performance >> tests. >> 2. MSMQ don't even get me started with this POS. >> 3. SONIC EMS no issues with any of the stress tests and performance >> tests. >> 4. ActiveMQ can not make it past any stress tests. See issues below for >> an >> understanding of what we saw. >> > > I don't see JBossMessaging in this list, is this not also a reasonably > mature option? > >
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-thoughts-tp14262131s2354p14295128.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
