It appears that it does not support C++ and is not as mature as ActiveMQ. Hellweek wrote: > > I will examine this option today. Thanks for the heads up. > > Jonathan Share wrote: >> >> Hellweek wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I know what I am about to post will upset a few people, however I think >>> it >>> is important that I document my experience with ActiveMQ in the hopes >>> that >>> others like me can have an understanding of the issues that you will >>> face. >>> >>> A little history. >>> >>> I am not new to Open Source projects, have been involved in them and >>> have >>> sponsored the use of open source for many years. >>> >>> I have been working with various message brokers for a few years. My >>> first >>> experience was with TIBCO EMS. Needless to say I was very impressed >>> with >>> the stability and functionality of this fine EMS. Next I had the >>> opportunity to work with Sonic EMS. Again I was impressed with this >>> product >>> and was even happier with its low cost of ownership. >>> >>> Over the last 6 weeks it has been my job to evaluate for our Trading >>> firm an >>> internal messaging system. We wanted to use a EMS solution for >>> dissemination of pricing data to our in-house applications as well as >>> external clients of ours. The messaging systems we are evaluating. >>> TIBCO >>> EMS, MSMQ 3.0, SONIC EMS, ACTIVEMQ 4.1.1 or ActieMQ 5.0. >>> >>> How did each product fair? >>> 1. Tibco EMS no issues with any of the stress tests and performance >>> tests. >>> 2. MSMQ don't even get me started with this POS. >>> 3. SONIC EMS no issues with any of the stress tests and performance >>> tests. >>> 4. ActiveMQ can not make it past any stress tests. See issues below for >>> an >>> understanding of what we saw. >>> >> >> I don't see JBossMessaging in this list, is this not also a reasonably >> mature option? >> >> > >
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-thoughts-tp14262131s2354p14299306.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
