This is good news. Please let me know if there is anything I can do. I would love to retest this once it has been marked as resolved.
James.Strachan wrote: > > On 12/12/2007, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Well my first impression was wrong also. I was assuming it was an issue >> with >> C++ and the broker. However after extensive testing I am sure it is a >> problem with interop with C# and C++. I would hope you dont run into >> this >> issue. >> >> I did get to testing C# to C# and I let it run full speed for over 3 >> hours >> sent and received more then 5 Million messages and it performed very >> well. >> >> For me that test was convincing enough to me that I am holding off on my >> Recomendation document. I am hoping that this is a fast easy fix. If it >> is >> I think I might just be able to still use ActiveMQ in production. > > Great thanks for letting us know! Hopefully we can get this issue > licked real soon now... > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://open.iona.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-thoughts-tp14262131s2354p14303228.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
