On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 13:27 +0100, Oscar Pernas wrote: > Hi all (again), > > > Im trying to understand well, how the failover transport works. I know that > if you have an active-pasive architecture and your active broker goes down, > all messages are send to the pasive broker. But, for example, if we have a > machine that have configured an active-pasive brokers configuration like > this: > > failover://(tcp://localhost:61616,localhost2:61616)?randomize=false > > If you remove the ethernet network cable, this machine couldnt connect to > any broker, but if I plug-in the cable again, to which broker the connection > will be stablished? if is developed like a pooling, could really happen that > this machine connect to the pasive broker instead to the first one? > > If this could happen, what is the usual way to change this machine to the > active? Im using activemq-cpp.
The slave broker won't accept connections until it becomes the master so the client won't connect to a slave. It will just keep moving through the list of URI's attempting to connect until a broker becomes available. Regards -- Tim Bish ------------ FuseSource Email: tim.b...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: tabish121 Blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
