And, adding my question... When Master Broker goes down, is there any way that administrators get a notification(e-mail etc...) that it went down.
Should Only a "manual" restart to bring it up again? Thank You, Nag. -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:32 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Failover, how does it work? On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 13:27 +0100, Oscar Pernas wrote: > Hi all (again), > > > Im trying to understand well, how the failover transport works. I know > that if you have an active-pasive architecture and your active broker > goes down, all messages are send to the pasive broker. But, for > example, if we have a machine that have configured an active-pasive > brokers configuration like > this: > > failover://(tcp://localhost:61616,localhost2:61616)?randomize=false > > If you remove the ethernet network cable, this machine couldnt connect > to any broker, but if I plug-in the cable again, to which broker the > connection will be stablished? if is developed like a pooling, could > really happen that this machine connect to the pasive broker instead to the > first one? > > If this could happen, what is the usual way to change this machine to > the active? Im using activemq-cpp. The slave broker won't accept connections until it becomes the master so the client won't connect to a slave. It will just keep moving through the list of URI's attempting to connect until a broker becomes available. Regards -- Tim Bish ------------ FuseSource Email: tim.b...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: tabish121 Blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
