Hi Prateek Thanks, however that example is for two brokers, which we already have working.
We are now adding a third broker to the cluster and want to understand how to change the co located backups according to my original post. Is that possible ? Regards Roy > On 27 Mar 2023, at 15:46, prateekjai...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > I dont exactly know your usecase or constraints but IMO, shared store > would have been a better option. As I didnt worked/explored 1.x version so, > wont comment on it. But you should be able to reference examples under > artemis directory: > > *examples\features\ha\colocated-failover* > > Hope it helps. > > Regards, > Prateek Jain > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > EXPECTATION : Causes all troubles...... > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:27 PM Roy Cohen <roy_co...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Anyone has any thoughts on the below ? >> >> On 23 Mar 2023, at 12:37, Roy Cohen <roy_co...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello everyone >> >> We have a setup of three Artemis brokers (very old version don’t ask :)) >> >> We would like to configure the co located backups such that the backups >> are sent in this order: >> >> Broker01 -> Broker02 >> Broker02 -> Broker03 >> Broker03 -> Broker01 >> >> >> I was reading on co located backups here: >> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/1.0.0/ha.html >> however not sure I fully understand how to configure the xml section to >> achieve that. >> >> Shall I add excludes in each broker, i.e. >> >> <colocated> >> <excludes> >> <connector-ref>...</connector-ref> >> </excludes> >> >> Any help would be appreciated. >> >> Many thanks in advance ! >> >> >>
