1. Why change ? 2. What would the co located back strategy look like with three ? Will it align to my expectation below ? Broker01 -> Broker02 Broker02 -> Broker03 Broker03 -> Broker01
3. How can I prove the co located backup strategy with three brokers ? > On 27 Mar 2023, at 16:05, prateekjai...@gmail.com wrote: > > IMO, the only change would be changing broker (61616 to something like > 61618) port. I would expect everything should work after that. > > Regards, > Prateek Jain > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > EXPECTATION : Causes all troubles...... > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:56 PM Roy Cohen <roy_co...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Prateek >> >> Thanks, however that example is for two brokers, which we already have >> working. >> >> We are now adding a third broker to the cluster and want to understand how >> to change the co located backups according to my original post. >> >> Is that possible ? >> >> Regards >> Roy >> >> >> >> >>> On 27 Mar 2023, at 15:46, prateekjai...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> Hi Roy, >>> >>> I dont exactly know your usecase or constraints but IMO, shared store >>> would have been a better option. As I didnt worked/explored 1.x version >> so, >>> wont comment on it. But you should be able to reference examples under >>> artemis directory: >>> >>> *examples\features\ha\colocated-failover* >>> >>> Hope it helps. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Prateek Jain >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> EXPECTATION : Causes all troubles...... >>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:27 PM Roy Cohen <roy_co...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Anyone has any thoughts on the below ? >>>> >>>> On 23 Mar 2023, at 12:37, Roy Cohen <roy_co...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello everyone >>>> >>>> We have a setup of three Artemis brokers (very old version don’t ask :)) >>>> >>>> We would like to configure the co located backups such that the backups >>>> are sent in this order: >>>> >>>> Broker01 -> Broker02 >>>> Broker02 -> Broker03 >>>> Broker03 -> Broker01 >>>> >>>> >>>> I was reading on co located backups here: >>>> >> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/1.0.0/ha.html >>>> however not sure I fully understand how to configure the xml section to >>>> achieve that. >>>> >>>> Shall I add excludes in each broker, i.e. >>>> >>>> <colocated> >>>> <excludes> >>>> <connector-ref>...</connector-ref> >>>> </excludes> >>>> >>>> Any help would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Many thanks in advance ! >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
