Sanjeev,

I followed a YouTube video explanation and did specify the tags "cloud-public"
to the guest and public networks - and "cloud-private" to the management
network.  The "public" IPs work fine for things like SSVM and Console Proxy VM,
hence my confusion.  I also used the "cloud-public" tag in two simple
network service offerings, one with no services and one with just DSN, DHCP,
and userdata.  No firewalls or security groups and default egress policy
set to "allow", although I'm not sure it was needed there.

Thanks.

Bryan


Quoting Sanjeev Neelarapu <sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com>:

> Hi Bryan Manske,
>
> Did you specify the tags cloud-public and cloud-private as traffic lables for
> public and private trafifics in the physical network ?
>
> -Sanjeev
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Manske [mailto:br...@manske.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 3:30 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0
>
> All,
>
> I'm still having issues with my CloudStack instances seeing the outside
> network and vice versa.  I've verified that other non-CloudStack VMs in the
> same IP subnet can see the default gateway and each other but they can't see
> the CloudStack instances.  The CloudStack instances can ping the VR but not
> the default gateway or any other non-CS VMs.  I'm using Xen Server 6.2 as the
> only hypervisor for the moment and have set the network interface tags
> (cloud-public and cloud-private) with "xe network-param-set
> name-label=cloud-public uuid=<interface-uuid>" and "xe
> network-
> list" looks correct.  Am I missing tags in the network offering or somewhere
> else?  I can't imagine that the CS VR would want to be the default gateway
> itself but I suppose its possible.  I've even been looking at VLANs (tagged
> versus untagged) at my network edge with no luck.
> "xe-switch-network-backend" is set to bridged so maybe its an openvswitch
> issue.  Big sigh.
>
> I've debugged as far as I can and need a few suggestions on where to look
> next.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bryan Manske
>
>
> Quoting Bryan Manske <br...@manske.org>:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Now I'm curious about public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0.
> >
> > I have one IPv4 /27 for Public IPs and that's working fine.  Now what
> > I want to do is assign a live IP address from another /27 to a Guest
> > VM, which appears to work but can't actually touch the default gateway.
> >
> > So here's the rub: The default gateway is actually provided as a
> > virtual IP on two VRRP nodes (for A/B redundancy) by my upstream
> > provider.  I can ping the two VRRP routers, I can see the VM has the
> > proper IP address, netmask, and default gateway; and I can configure
> > the VM with a proper IP config which never finds the default gateway
> > IP.  The arp cache sees the local MAC address and incomplete for the
> gateway.
> >
> > So now I'm thinking; according to cloudstack, is the default gateway
> > plumbed on a virtual router?  If so, how does THAT route out to the world?
> >
> > I also have a /64 of IPv6 space, /96 of which I have configured in a
> > network offering which has the same upstream infrastructure situation.
> > Same lack of functionality there.
> >
> > So how do I configure my Guest real IP netblocks?  Is it okay to be
> > looking for a default gateway IP on a my provider's core router or do
> > I need to have them statically route that netblock to something like
> > the cloudstack management host?
> >
> > Of course I could also have the network offering wrong or incomplete.
> >
> > Any thoughts or pointers to documentation would be appreciated.
> >
> > I can tell I'm making progress because I keep dealing with
> > progressively higher level errors. :)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Bryan Manske
> >
> >
> > ---
> > "Earnest falsehoods left unchallenged risk being accepted as fact."
> >  -- Monty "xiphmont" Montgomery - Xiph Foundation, on the Ogg format
> > ---
> >
>
>
> ---
> "Earnest falsehoods left unchallenged risk being accepted as fact."
>  -- Monty "xiphmont" Montgomery - Xiph Foundation, on the Ogg format
> ---
>


---
"Earnest falsehoods left unchallenged risk being accepted as fact."
 -- Monty "xiphmont" Montgomery - Xiph Foundation, on the Ogg format
---

Reply via email to