Yes I meant RAID10, not 1 :) Sorry about that. As for local storage, so you're "local" as in it's own dedicated server, outside the HV (CPU/Memory) server correct?
-----Original Message----- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:55 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New to CS, some prep questions On 26.03.2014 15:34, Talk Jesus wrote: > Thanks for the response. I actually forgot to include one serve for > actual storage. However, would it be more simplified and easier to > just have a the storage server act also as the CPU/Memory (power) > server too? Does CloudStack have some config ability to claim a server > as an HA server (high availability)? You can use local storage, I would actually recommend it if you want SSDs, but there is no way to achieve HA with local storage, you need it shared. > Server #2 > Purpose: Hypervisors (CPU + Memory + Storage) > Qty: 1 plus 1 for failover (HA) > Dual Hexacore CPUs > 128GB RAM > 12 x 1TB SAS (or SSD) RAID1 > *above drives is for main storage, I know is pricey, but it's only for > an example* I'd go for RAID10 in this case. Be advised, all this is IMHO, YMMV. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
