---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel D <daniel...@gmail.com> Date: 2013/8/10 Subject: Re: IDE for Apache Flex To: users@flex.apache.org Cc: jef...@dot-com-it.com
Hello Matt, I do not know IntelliJ, but I've heard it, I'm User of Eclipse and would not trade for anything. Flash Builder is excellent, but in version 4.7 64-bit, removed the design view. My computer is 64 bit, but I have to use version 4.6 32-bit for it. I believe that an IDE based on Eclipse 32 or 64 bits easy to use, free, Opensource, popularize Apache Flex, which has been losing a lot for HTML5. Thanks. 2013/8/10 Mathieu St-Gelais <mathieu.stgel...@gmail.com> > I understand your point. If you're already paying for Flash Builder, you > could instead pay for IntelliJ (approximately the same price). It is, in my > opinion, a brilliant IDE and it works great with Apache Flex. > > Mat > > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Daniel D <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would love to participate in an open source project, but I have no > > experience in creating plugins for Eclipse or time to learn now, but I > > think an IDE with good resources becomes more attractive language for new > > programmers. window components and drag components. the problem is the > > alignment of the components, it takes a long compile to see the swf in > the > > browser. > > > > I program in Java and Flex to 8 years, and use Flash Builder 4.6 in 32 > bit > > mode, not like the 4.7 64-bit. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > 2013/8/10 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> > > > > > On 8/10/2013 1:48 PM, Daniel D wrote: > > > > > >> The Apache will create an IDE for Flex, based on Eclipse 64 bit ? > > >> > > > > > > I have not heard of any plans to create a full fledged IDE. But, if > you > > > think this is important, I strongly encourage you to start. > > > > > > > > > > > > Because the latest version of Adobe Flash Builder 4.7 64 bit is > > horrible, > > >> removed the display design for mxml, why? > > >> > > > We have been told that design view was removed because it was very > > > difficult to update; was not flexible enough to support multiple > versions > > > of Flex; and was very rarely used by developers. > > > > > > If memory serves me; there was an AIR Based replacement for design > view > > > that was demoed relatively recently. > > > > > > You are more than welcome to create one or start one if you think it > is > > > important. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jeffry Houser > > > Technical Entrepreneur > > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > > > 203-379-0773 > > > > > > > > >
