1. Not sure what your point with 32- & 64-bit is about, but working with a 32 bit program on a 64 bit machine is totally fine.
2. If you want to stick with Eclipse and just need to replace Flashbuilder, you might want to have a look at FDT: http://fdt.powerflasher.com/ Am 10.08.2013 20:58, schrieb Daniel D: > Hello Matt, > > I do not know IntelliJ, but I've heard it, I'm User of Eclipse and would > not trade for anything. Flash Builder is excellent, but in version 4.7 > 64-bit, removed the design view. My computer is 64 bit, but I have to use > version 4.6 32-bit for it. > > I believe that an IDE based on Eclipse 32 or 64 bits easy to use, free, > Opensource, popularize Apache Flex, which has been losing a lot for HTML5. > > Thanks. > > 2013/8/10 Mathieu St-Gelais <mathieu.stgel...@gmail.com> > >> I understand your point. If you're already paying for Flash Builder, you >> could instead pay for IntelliJ (approximately the same price). It is, in my >> opinion, a brilliant IDE and it works great with Apache Flex. >> >> Mat >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Daniel D <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I would love to participate in an open source project, but I have no >>> experience in creating plugins for Eclipse or time to learn now, but I >>> think an IDE with good resources becomes more attractive language for new >>> programmers. window components and drag components. the problem is the >>> alignment of the components, it takes a long compile to see the swf in >> the >>> browser. >>> >>> I program in Java and Flex to 8 years, and use Flash Builder 4.6 in 32 >> bit >>> mode, not like the 4.7 64-bit. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> 2013/8/10 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> >>> >>>> On 8/10/2013 1:48 PM, Daniel D wrote: >>>> >>>>> The Apache will create an IDE for Flex, based on Eclipse 64 bit ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I have not heard of any plans to create a full fledged IDE. But, if >> you >>>> think this is important, I strongly encourage you to start. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Because the latest version of Adobe Flash Builder 4.7 64 bit is >>> horrible, >>>>> removed the display design for mxml, why? >>>>> >>>> We have been told that design view was removed because it was very >>>> difficult to update; was not flexible enough to support multiple >> versions >>>> of Flex; and was very rarely used by developers. >>>> >>>> If memory serves me; there was an AIR Based replacement for design >> view >>>> that was demoed relatively recently. >>>> >>>> You are more than welcome to create one or start one if you think it >> is >>>> important. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jeffry Houser >>>> Technical Entrepreneur >>>> http://www.jeffryhouser.com >>>> 203-379-0773 >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
