Sorry, Darren, I mistyped your name...

On 3/14/14 11:22 AM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Darrell,
>
>First, just try adding the MXMLC option -static-rsls=false.  Yes, this
>means your app won't use any RSLs, but I just want to see if your app will
>actually run with mixed code (which is totally not supported, but might
>work).  If it does work, then we'll figure out the configuration that you
>can use every RSL except the charts RSL.
>
>And if that doesn't work, then grabbing the source from Apache Flex and
>using it as a monkey-patch should work, as long as there aren't API
>incompatibilities.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 3/14/14 11:10 AM, "DarrenEvans" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>After posting a comment on
>>https://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/wiki/Flex%204.6/
>><https://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/wiki/Flex%204.6/>   and being
>>kindly
>>answered by Alex Harui, he directed me here to continue.
>>
>>For a bunch of reason we are stuck on Flex SDK 4.6 for the forseeable
>>future.
>>
>>The problem we want to fix is around chart functionality. We have
>>implemented some charts but they are incredibly slow to initialise (10 -
>>30
>>seconds). 
>>
>>I have seen this issue
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/FLEX-33216
>><https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/FLEX-33216>   and was hoping to
>>apply the fix to our 4.6 SDK to see if it helps at all.
>>
>>*What's the best way to do this?*
>>
>>I was originally going to rebuild the Flex 4.6 SDK, retrofitting the
>>modifications. However, Alex suggested swapping the charts.swc lib file.
>>I
>>have tried this (using 4.12 Apache SDK file) and although our main
>>project
>>seems to compile our test project results in the following error:
>>
>>[TestHealthRosterClient] No signed digest found in catalog.xml of the
>>library, C:\Workspaces\sdks\Flex\4.6.0\frameworks\libs\charts.swc.
>>Compile
>>the library with -create-digest=true and try again.
>>
>>We are using IntelliJ to build our product. The main project did build
>>but
>>seemed to run equally slowly. However, I'm not entirely sure the modified
>>swc was picked up......
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>View this message in context:
>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Patching-Flex-4-6-SDK-char
>>t
>>-functionality-tp5527.html
>>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to