On 2/26/16, 12:53 AM, "sta-ger" <pascaldel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>OmPrakash Muppirala wrote >> I don't think it will be too hard to build a Feathers like UI components >> set on top of this. >> >> You are welcome to try :-) > > >Sounds very interesting! (: But imho one of the biggest advantage of Flex >is >ability to use MXML layouts. So it's not enough just to build another one >webgl based components framework. Is it posible to teach FalconJX to >translate MXML layouts to something based on Lizhi's framework? Even more, >it's not a bad idea to add multi-language suppurt for FlexJS so that it >can >work not only with AS, but also with JS/Typescript or even C# and other >modern languages. I understand that this is not very realistically today, >but I'm just dreaming about Flex as a strong and modern RIA framework as >it >was 10 years ago. (: Unfortunatelly I have 0 experience of contributing >open-source projects and have 0 time for it... All of the above has been designed into the FalconJX compiler. MXML could in theory be used for any other UI Framework if the framework implements support for MXML. All the compiler does now is add a up to three properties (MXMLProperties, MXMLDescriptor, MXMLStateDescriptor) and supplies encoded information about the MXML. The framework just has to decide when to interpret and apply the encoded information. It still need to be proven by someone actually trying it with a completely different framework, but we want it to work that way. The output from FalconJX doesn't have to be JS. Someone can write a TS or C# or other language output if they want and plug it in instead of the JSEmitter. And there can be different flavors of JS emitters as well. -Alex
