Hi :)
MS Office 2007 & 2010 claims to be able to use OpenDocument Formats such as Odt 
and Ods but it only handles the ancient 1.1 version, not the 1.2 taht most 
other programs have been using for years (although it was only formally 
released in about last Aug or something).  

Similarly LO supports doc and xls which are standard formats handled by all 
versions of MS Office.  For the most part it also handles docX and xlsX and so 
on except for occasional problems when MS Office doesn't implement it's own 
specification for those formats.  
Regards from
Tom :)



--- On Tue, 20/3/12, Shari <uneedstuff.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Shari <uneedstuff.sh...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] saving as docx crashes libreoffice 3.5.1 on 
windows 7
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 20 March, 2012, 21:58

@darwinev0lved
Based on this email response maybe LibreOffice should remove this from 
their website:
"Compatible with all major competitors' file formats. You can easily 
import files from Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint and many other 
formats, and can easily save to Microsoft Office and other formats when 
needed."

This person is only asking to do what the website says it can. Either it 
can or it can't.
Shari

On 3/20/2012 4:21 PM, e-letter wrote:
> On 20/03/2012, darwinev0lved<darwinev0l...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> HI, I was having problem with a docx document that work sent me (actually,
>> this isn't the first time, but it'd be nice to sort it if poss.). When I try
>> to save it, it crashes LO, I can recover it, I can save it as an odt but at
>> some point I'm going to have to send it back, so I need to be able to save
>> it as a docx.
>>
> Your company should be paying you to buy a legitimate copy of m$...
>
> Why do you want LO to be a m$-clone? Who benefits?
>
> m$ formats are irrelevant to odf. The priority for LO is superior
> behaviour of the software with native formats.
>
> How does the perfect m$-clone behaviour of LO desired by so many
> unwilling to pay the m$ tax benefit the preferred proliferation of
> odf?
>
>> I though it might be something off with the document itself, so I opened up
>> a blank document and tried to save that as a docx file - well this time I
>> got "Libreoffice 3.5 has stopped working"
>>
>> So, not great.
>>
> Strategically, it is great; m$ fans are forced to make a decision: pay
> the m$ to continue using and propagating the m$ formats.
>
> Have you conducted a full cost-benefit analysis of the time you are
> wasting (yours, programmers who choose to write code gratis) compared
> to you buying m$ and therefore releasing more time available to
> improve odf???
>
>> Advice, thoughts?
> Please create a new document in odf using LO. When you open that
> document using m$ and notice the destruction of the quality of your
> original document, write to m$ and ask them to explain why m$ is
> unable to open your odf document properly and correctly. Don't forget
> to also ask m$ how to submit a bug report for the faulty performance
> of m$. Tell us the response.
>

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to