Hello,
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:02:46 +0100, David Jordan
<jdavidjorda...@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree that have some discussion about this is very useful. Many of us
have tried to evangelize semantic web technologies in our organizations
and > have struggled and failed because we cannot provide sufficient
justification for using the technology. Hearing the specific value
provided that can convince the skeptics is extremely valuable, much more
valuable
than simple support questions about a particular API interface.
yes, i thing similar things, also like others responding to this thread in
an open minded way...
But i also want to describe something for the future:
I imagine, a cheekily developer constructs a small, easily understandable
and effectively implementable 'subset' of the whole thing 'Semantic Web'
defining a new playing field or making great progress in usual apps of
today.
This cold be the realisation of TBL cit. (about 20 years ago?): 'The most
exciting things about Semantic Web is not what we can imagine to do with
it, but we can't yet imagine it will do.'
First step is always a very simple and comprehensible idea.. This means
downsizing the whole thing to a simplified kernel for a special
application field... Better late than never...
This is really what i instinctively think about this stuff after so many
years. I know, such things are totally off topic for Jena team, but my
posting is for 2 or 3 users who can be interested, if it is allowed...
thanks, baran.
************
On 10/02/17 12:22, kumar rohit wrote:
Hi, what are the benefits of semantic web technologies? I have used
semantic web technologies from one year but, in theory I am not sure
the
real advantages of semantic web.
When we develop a system using traditional RDBMS and Java and same
system
we develop using Java/Jena Protege SPARQL etc, so what is the
advantage of
the latter application?
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
