For example, there is an rdf document about a student. Student rdf:type Person. Student hasName name. Student hasAdress adress
Student study Course. Where is the meta data here. How machines understand this data. On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Trevor Lazarus <tre...@newgen.co> wrote: > Greetings Tina, > > If you come to think about it, what happens to a Web page in Google > Search's results listing if you take out Schema.org markup? you're only > left with human readable information, this is only from a presentation > point of view, think Information Retrieval and this thing called the SW > makes a lot of sense to use. > > Moving on to Inferences, if you used the right Ontology, you could start to > infer newer facts that we've never stored in the triple store in the first > place, among many other things > > It's like Lorenz pointed, you're comparing the Web of Data to a Web of > Documents. > > On 5 June 2017 at 09:18, Trevor Lazarus <tre...@newgen.co> wrote: > > > Greetings Tina, > > > > If you come to think about it, what happens to a Web page in Google > > Search's results listing if you take out Schema.org markup? you're only > > left with human readable information, this is only from a presentation > > point of view, think Information Retrieval and this thing called the SW > > makes a lot of sense to use. > > > > Moving on to Inferences, if you used the right Ontology, you could start > > to infer newer facts that we've never stored in the triple store in the > > first place, among many other things > > > > It's like Lorenz pointed, you're comparing the Web of Data to a Web of > > Documents. > > > > On 4 June 2017 at 23:51, tina sani <tinamadri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Greetings > >> > >> I want to ask how Semantic Web provides meaning to our data? How it > >> differs > >> from the current web. > >> I will appreciate if some one provide with a simple examples: If we > write > >> an Ontology and develop Semantic Web application, how it differs from a > >> simple Java application (without Semantic Web) and a traditional > database > >> system? > >> > > > > > > -- > > > The information in this email and attachments is privileged and > confidential and may not be disclosed without the express permission of the > sender. This information is intended only for the use of the individual to > whom it is addressed. If you have received this communication in error, > your review, dissemination, or copying of this information is prohibited. > Please reply to alert me of the error and then delete this email. Thank > you. >
