The metadata is right there for a machine to interpret, for e.g. one could write a bit of JS for the machine to understand that a URI say http://domain/student-4321 is a type of foaf:Person and not a Parrot and based on the Ontology(FOAF in this case) look out for a foaf:name predicate, with a bit more JS one could program the machine to display the literal value, say "Samantha" with some fancy HTML+CSS. Similarly one could program the machine to display the address as both a String formatted nicely and geocoded into a pair of geospatial coordinates on a Map.
Trevor On 6 June 2017 at 17:07, tina sani <tinamadri...@gmail.com> wrote: > For example, there is an rdf document about a student. > > Student rdf:type Person. Student hasName name. Student hasAdress adress > > Student study Course. > > Where is the meta data here. How machines understand this data. > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Trevor Lazarus <tre...@newgen.co> wrote: > > > Greetings Tina, > > > > If you come to think about it, what happens to a Web page in Google > > Search's results listing if you take out Schema.org markup? you're only > > left with human readable information, this is only from a presentation > > point of view, think Information Retrieval and this thing called the SW > > makes a lot of sense to use. > > > > Moving on to Inferences, if you used the right Ontology, you could start > to > > infer newer facts that we've never stored in the triple store in the > first > > place, among many other things > > > > It's like Lorenz pointed, you're comparing the Web of Data to a Web of > > Documents. > > > > On 5 June 2017 at 09:18, Trevor Lazarus <tre...@newgen.co> wrote: > > > > > Greetings Tina, > > > > > > If you come to think about it, what happens to a Web page in Google > > > Search's results listing if you take out Schema.org markup? you're only > > > left with human readable information, this is only from a presentation > > > point of view, think Information Retrieval and this thing called the SW > > > makes a lot of sense to use. > > > > > > Moving on to Inferences, if you used the right Ontology, you could > start > > > to infer newer facts that we've never stored in the triple store in the > > > first place, among many other things > > > > > > It's like Lorenz pointed, you're comparing the Web of Data to a Web of > > > Documents. > > > > > > On 4 June 2017 at 23:51, tina sani <tinamadri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Greetings > > >> > > >> I want to ask how Semantic Web provides meaning to our data? How it > > >> differs > > >> from the current web. > > >> I will appreciate if some one provide with a simple examples: If we > > write > > >> an Ontology and develop Semantic Web application, how it differs from > a > > >> simple Java application (without Semantic Web) and a traditional > > database > > >> system? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The information in this email and attachments is privileged and > > confidential and may not be disclosed without the express permission of > the > > sender. This information is intended only for the use of the individual > to > > whom it is addressed. If you have received this communication in error, > > your review, dissemination, or copying of this information is prohibited. > > Please reply to alert me of the error and then delete this email. Thank > > you. > > > -- The information in this email and attachments is privileged and confidential and may not be disclosed without the express permission of the sender. This information is intended only for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you have received this communication in error, your review, dissemination, or copying of this information is prohibited. Please reply to alert me of the error and then delete this email. Thank you.
