Matthias,

What about testing topology that use avro schema ? Have you read my
previous response ?

Thanks.

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:34 AM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> Colin,
>
> the TopologyTestDriver does not connect to any broker and simulates
> processing of single-partitioned input topics purely in-memory (the
> driver is basically a mock for a StreamThread). This is sufficient to
> test basic business logic. For more complex topologies that are actually
> divided into sub-topologies and connected via topics, the driver detects
> this case and does an in-memory forward.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 1/16/18 10:08 AM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> > Thanks, Matthias, this looks great.
> >
> > It seems like these APIs could either be used against mock objects, or
> against real brokers running in the same process.  Is there a way for the
> user to select which they want when using the API?  Sorry if it's in the
> KIP and I missed it.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Colin
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018, at 18:06, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> >> Dear Kafka community,
> >>
> >> I want to propose KIP-247 to add public test utils to the Streams API.
> >> The goal is to simplify testing of Kafka Streams applications.
> >>
> >> Please find details in the wiki:
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-247%3A+Add+public+test+utils+for+Kafka+Streams
> >>
> >> This is an initial KIP, and we hope to add more utility functions later.
> >> Thus, this KIP is not comprehensive but a first step. Of course, we can
> >> enrich this initial KIP if we think it falls too short. But we should
> >> not aim to be comprehensive to keep the scope manageable.
> >>
> >> In fact, I think we should add some more helpers to simplify result
> >> verification. I will update the KIP with this asap. Just wanted to start
> >> the discussion early on.
> >>
> >> An initial WIP PR can be found here:
> >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4402
> >>
> >> I also included the user-list (please hit "reply-all" to include both
> >> lists in this KIP discussion).
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >> Email had 1 attachment:
> >> + signature.asc
> >>   1k (application/pgp-signature)
>
>

-- 
*Saïd Bouras*

Reply via email to