Davy Mitchell wrote: > Are Resolver Users looking to reuse their existing code in > spreadsheets or just have the same facilities? If the latter then SWIG > for Dotnet seems a better option than COM and is more Mono friendly. > I think having the same facilities is vital, but having the same interface is very important. If I understand it correctly, the problem with SWIG is that it relies on there already existing a solid, well-designed C API which can be wrapped - which is the case for NumPy, but isn't for C extensions in general AFAIK.
Regards, Giles -- Giles Thomas MD & CTO, Resolver Systems Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 (0) 20 7253 6372 We're hiring! http://www.resolversystems.com/jobs/ 17a Clerkenwell Road, London EC1M 5RD, UK VAT No.: GB 893 5643 79 Registered in England and Wales as company number 5467329. Registered address: 843 Finchley Road, London NW11 8NA, UK _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
