Curt Hagenlocher wrote: > On 10/17/07, *Giles Thomas* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Curt - how does MC++ relate to using P/Invoke? That is, is it > P/Invoke plus some clever packaging stuff to allow you to produce > a single assembly with both machine code and MSIL, or is there > more to it than that? Or is it something completely different? > > > I'd guess they share some internals -- why write the same thunking > code twice, after all. But their usage patterns are sufficiently > different that I'd argue the internals don't really matter. P/Invoke > requires you to declare everything explicitly, while the goal for MC++ > is to make interop as transparent as possible.
I would be sad if we chose any approach that couldn't work on Mono. :-( Michael http://www.manning.com/foord > > -- > Curt Hagenlocher > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
