Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
> On 10/17/07, *Giles Thomas* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Curt - how does MC++ relate to using P/Invoke?  That is, is it
>     P/Invoke plus some clever packaging stuff to allow you to produce
>     a single assembly with both machine code and MSIL, or is there
>     more to it than that?  Or is it something completely different?
>
>  
> I'd guess they share some internals -- why write the same thunking 
> code twice, after all.  But their usage patterns are sufficiently 
> different that I'd argue the internals don't really matter.  P/Invoke 
> requires you to declare everything explicitly, while the goal for MC++ 
> is to make interop as transparent as possible.

I would be sad if we chose any approach that couldn't work on Mono. :-(

Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord

>  
> --
> Curt Hagenlocher
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>   

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

Reply via email to