On 10/16/08 22:07, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>
>
>>> If it is loose_route() that I need to correlate subsequent in-dialog
>>> requests, why? As you said, if no RR cookies are being used, why should the
>>> proxy care about the Route: header?
>>>
>> I don't know how to put it better in other words :(
>> The proxy doesn't care about the Route header.
>> The proxy uses the record routing mechanism as a hook into the dialog
>> internals and the matching is done inside the dialog module. After
>> that, the dialog module will chose the matching mechanism.
>>
>
> I got that.
>
> So, why does matching not work unless I call loose_route(), regardless
> of match mode? :-)
>
the matching is triggered by execution of Route processing callbacks
that happen only by calling loose_route().
The dialog module registers a function to be called when the Route
header is processed. In this function the dialog module does the
matching algorithm. To get independent of that, for matching mode 2, a
function should be exported by dialog for explicit call in the script,
something like:
if(dialog_match())
{
....
}
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
