Klaus Darilion wrote: > > > Alex Balashov schrieb: >> Klaus Darilion wrote: >>> I guess as long as all the clients are loose_routers (final target in >>> the RURI) it will work even without loose_route, if you only have 1 >>> proxy between the clients. >>> >>> Of course the forwarded in-dialgo requests will still have an Route >>> header which is actually not RFC conform but ignored by allmost all >>> SIP clients. >> >> So, you're saying it's better to run loose_route() to have it consume >> this extraneous Route: header? > > Better? hard to say > > But at least more elegant and standard conform
Well, thank you, I appreciate the insight. :) -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
