Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
> On 10/16/08 22:07, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> If it is loose_route() that I need to correlate subsequent in-dialog
>>>> requests, why? As you said, if no RR cookies are being used, why
>>>> should the
>>>> proxy care about the Route: header?
>>>>
>>> I don't know how to put it better in other words :(
>>> The proxy doesn't care about the Route header.
>>> The proxy uses the record routing mechanism as a hook into the dialog
>>> internals and the matching is done inside the dialog module. After
>>> that, the dialog module will chose the matching mechanism.
>>>
>>
>> I got that.
>>
>> So, why does matching not work unless I call loose_route(), regardless
>> of match mode? :-)
>>
> the matching is triggered by execution of Route processing callbacks
> that happen only by calling loose_route().
>
> The dialog module registers a function to be called when the Route
> header is processed. In this function the dialog module does the
> matching algorithm. To get independent of that, for matching mode 2, a
> function should be exported by dialog for explicit call in the script,
> something like:
>
> if(dialog_match())
> {
> ....
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
That's what I figured; there was something in the callback architecture
that caused the module to otherwise not see the requests.
Cool - that explains it!
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
