Dear Mr. Squyres, Thank you for your clear answer on the state of the interfaces in the mpi modules of OPENMPI. A good state! And I have coded sufficiently bugs myself, so I do not become too angry about the bugs of others. If I should stumble upon missing Ftn-bindings in the future, I will send you a hint.
Greetings to you all! Michael Rachner -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: users [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] Im Auftrag von Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. November 2014 15:10 An: Open MPI User's List Betreff: Re: [OMPI users] OPENMPI-1.8.3: missing fortran bindings for MPI_SIZEOF On Nov 6, 2014, at 8:55 AM, <michael.rach...@dlr.de> <michael.rach...@dlr.de> wrote: > I agree fully with omitting the explicit interfaces from mpif.h . It is an > important resort for legacy codes. > But, in the mpi and mpi_f08 module explicit interfaces are required for > all(!) MPI-routines. > So far, this is not fulfilled in MPI-versions I know. Bugs happen. I think you're saying that we don't intend to have all the routines in the mpi and mpi_f08 modules. That's not correct. We *do* have all explicit MPI interface in the mpi and mpi_f08 modules. If some are missing -- like WIN_ALLOCATE was just discovered to be missing in the 1.8.3 release -- those are bugs. We try really hard to avoid bugs, but sometimes they happen. :-( Are you aware of other routines that are missing from the OMPI mpi / mpi_f08 modules? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users Link to this post: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/11/25700.php
