Reuti <re...@staff.uni-marburg.de> writes: >> If so, I’m wondering if that NULL he shows in there is the source of the >> trouble. The parser doesn’t look like it would handle that very well, though >> I’d need to test it. Is that NULL expected? Or is the NULL not really in the >> file? > > I must admit here: for me the fourth column is either literally > UNDEFINED or the tuple cpu,core in case of turned on binding like 0,0 > But it's never <NULL>, neither literally nor the byte 0x00. Maybe the > OP can tell us which GE version he uses,.
See the source of sge_exec_job. I see I should fix sge_pe(5).
