Le 19/09/2018 à 11:17, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Le 17/09/2018 à 19:03, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
[No answers]
Hello all,
Do I have to conclude that the implementation is currently so
incoherent that *nobody* uses integer types in Scilab (other than
Scilab code itself) ?
The current implementation is not incoherent.
However, there are still bugs, and when trying to solve them, the
question of incoherence raises. See e.g :
--> int8(-128)/int8(-1)
ans =
-128
The message was likely not published on users@. The traffic is (much?)
lower on dev@ than on users@.
A poor trafic about this topic could also mean that
* most of Scilab users working with encoded integers are satisfied.
No answer = status quo.
* or almost nobody uses Scilab. So, never mind any deep changes. You
can do whatever you want on a relic.
Best regards
Samuel
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/1/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
