Le 19/09/2018 à 11:01, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Le 18/09/2018 à 19:26, philippe a écrit :
Le 17/09/2018 à 19:03, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Do I have to conclude that the implementation is currently so
incoherent
that *nobody* uses integer types in Scilab (other than Scilab code
itself) ?
it's a new feature,
It would not be a new feature, but a change. This means that for 30
years that Scilab
and its int8 uint8 int16 uint16 int32 uint32 datatypes exist, the
current algebra is used,
and is used in a consistent way, even if in some aspects we may deem
that this way
is too rough. At least, it is predictable, and manageable.
And so, changing the current algebra would break all codes implemented
with encoded
integers for 30 years.
The aim of my first message was a try to clarify this point. Where are
this codes ? In scilab itself, in user codes ? To me, user codes having
been untouched since 10 years are not used any more...
S.
While introducing an actually new feature breaks nothing.
Regards
Samuel
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/1/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
