----- Message d'origine ----
> De : Albert Kurucz <albert.kur...@gmail.com>
> À : Maven Users List <users@maven.apache.org>
> Envoyé le : Lundi, 28 Septembre 2009, 19h39mn 00s
> Objet : Re: Maven Central Repository - Cleanup Efforts
>
> Tamas, could explain "MRMs + grouping + mirrorOf" or send a link?
http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/maven-sect-single-group.html
>
> 2009/9/28 Tamás Cservenák :
> > Sorry for thread hijack, but was not able to resist...
> >
> > Another thing to think about, since it's adoption:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We do not allow definitions in pom files for a good reason.
> >>
> >>
> > This seemed as a good idea, but.... think about it.
> >
> > Why would you _not_ put reposes in POMs? Because they will be _burned_ in to
> > your POMs forever and your URLs may change down the road?
> >
> > Why is this better:
> >
> > * having repository defs in POMs, thus providing at least some usable info
> > that a developer may use as starting point and google it up/search/look for
> > it (where it went, what it was, etc)
> >
> > then:
> >
> > * providing _no_ useful information in POMs for future generations? Having
> > no trace in your _build_ about needed reposes...
> >
> > Ah yes, _both_ cases are easily handled by MRMs + grouping + mirrorOf, but
> > in 2nd case, the one building may only shoot in the dark, you did not
> > provide _any_ information from what did you build your stuff.
> >
> > Think about it.
> > ~t~
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
