You may want to look at the wiki for this one. http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Performance
Dennis Byrne >-----Original Message----- >From: jfaronson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Saturday, July 8, 2006 08:11 PM >To: users@myfaces.apache.org >Subject: JSF Performance Problems > > >I grabbed the attachments from the original performance bug >https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3 and ran some >JMeter tests against the "JSP only" and the JSF versions. > >The pages are really simple, the JSP version outputs a page which is >visually identical to the JSF page. The table in question had 10 columns and >50 - 200 rows. Not a huge amount of data. I used MyFaces 1.1.3 as the JSF >implementation and ran the test in JBoss 4.0.4 GA running on JDK 1.4.2. > >Here's the results: > > > > Table Rows Average [ms] Median [ms] Hits / Min Samples >JSF Testcase 50 36 30 1300 5007 >JSP Testcase 50 14 10 4030 5001 >JSF Testcase 100 56 60 1050 5001 >JSP Testcase 100 21 20 2700 5001 >JSF Testcase 200 100 100 590 5001 >JSP Testcase 200 26 30 2170 5001 > > > >This data confirms the discussion in the sun forum. The JSF version started >out nearly three times slower than the JSP page. The relative performance of >the JSF version degraded to nearly four times slower as table rows were >added. > >So if you are thinking about adopting JSF you should be aware of the >performance hit and make sure that you can architect around the problem or >get the performance benchmarks adjusted. Perceived performance is important >in real life projects so it's more than a theoretical problem. > >I'd also like to know if anybody has ideas or code samples that make JSF >perform better? >-- >View this message in context: >http://www.nabble.com/JSF-Performance-Problems-tf1912565.html#a5236070 >Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com. >
