Faclets gives you +10 -> 15% more

On 7/9/06, Yee CN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




Is the result with Myfaces/JSP?  Can somebody provide performance comparison
with Myfaces/Facelets?



JSF is still a new technology, and there are still plenty of rooms for
improvements. Furthermore the performance differential won't be as drastic
once we factor in business logic, persistence, AJAX etc.



IMHO reduce development time is still the most important factor to consider.



Regards,

Yee



 ________________________________


From: jfaronson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 8:11 AM

 To: users@myfaces.apache.org
 Subject: JSF Performance Problems







I grabbed the attachments from the original performance bug
https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
and ran some JMeter tests against the "JSP only" and the JSF versions. The
pages are really simple, the JSP version outputs a page which is visually
identical to the JSF page. The table in question had 10 columns and 50 - 200
rows. Not a huge amount of data. I used MyFaces 1.1.3 as the JSF
implementation and ran the test in JBoss 4.0.4 GA running on JDK 1.4.2.
Here's the results:

               Table Rows   Average [ms]  Median [ms]   Hits / Min   Samples
JSF Testcase    50           36            30            1300         5007
JSP Testcase    50           14            10            4030         5001
JSF Testcase    100          56            60            1050         5001
JSP Testcase    100          21            20            2700         5001
JSF Testcase    200          100           100           590          5001
JSP Testcase    200          26            30            2170         5001


This data confirms the discussion in the sun forum. The JSF version started
out nearly three times slower than the JSP page. The relative performance of
the JSF version degraded to nearly four times slower as table rows were
added. So if you are thinking about adopting JSF you should be aware of the
performance hit and make sure that you can architect around the problem or
get the performance benchmarks adjusted. Perceived performance is important
in real life projects so it's more than a theoretical problem. I'd also like
to know if anybody has ideas or code samples that make JSF perform better?
 ________________________________


View this message in context: JSF Performance Problems
 Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com.



--
Matthias Wessendorf

futher stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to