I can't say as I have used either, they just came up with some google
searching. I definitely think some research is in order and hopefully
some opinions from the community for any that people have used. I know
that A4J uses some of them.
Perhaps the suggestion for firebug lite may be good. It could be
injected on an as-need basis, and therefore would be faster for users
that already have firebug.
Another sickening thought is to have Trinidad with its own logging
solution, that delegates to something like firebug lite or log4js,
etc. The script could be loaded only when needed. This could be
possibly flagged in the web.xml as a context param (enabled javascript
logging). If the script is not loaded, the Trinidad's API would simply
be a black hole.
Syntax could be something like:
Log.<level>(<obj>)
In this example, Log.error('hello world); would call <Log
library>.<error log method>('hello world');
If logging was turned off (default), Log.error() would have no method
body. This way the extra javascript would simply be a few extra empty
functions.
Just a thought.
-Andrew
On 9/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the sf.net project hasn't been touched since 17 month.
> The berlin-os is shipping a larger file.
>
> Perhaps some more testing/evaluating needs to be done.
>
> -M
>
> On 9/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > I think enhancing the logging in Trinidad's JS is valuable. Both have
> > a very good license.
> > The question is now, which is the "best" of the two ?
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Matthias
> >
> > On 9/13/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I put a comment on the bug to possibly enhance Trinidad's logging to
> > > use log4js. There are two projects with that name, one at sourceforge
> > > and one at berlios. I think either may be work looking at. They should
> > > both work in any browser that I am aware of.
> > >
> > > What do you think Adam?
> > > -Andrew
> > >
> > > On 9/13/07, Bertrand, Shawn R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The error dialog indeed doesn't appear in Firefox, though would it if
> > > > Firebug wasn't installed? There doesn't appear to be any sort of error
> > > > when
> > > > running in Firefox – all I see in the Firebug console are POST messages
> > > > as
> > > > expected.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I haven't looked at the current 1.0.2 codebase, but does it contain the
> > > > change as outlined by Andrew for this? I guess I'd like to update to
> > > > it if
> > > > possible, because I can't see our users having to put up with dismissing
> > > > this error.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Alternately, how might I go about finding the cause of the error
> > > > message in
> > > > IE?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Shawn
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:08 PM
> > > > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > > > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] "console" is undefined?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is indeed an attempt to call the firebug console (if
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > it exists), and Andrew's totally right that the syntax here
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > is wrong. FWIW, this should only be called if an error
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > has occurred, not in ordinary execution, so there's a more
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > essential problem elsewhere.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/12/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I get this all of the time to. I believe console is the firebug
> > > > globally installed window variable (plug-in for firefox)
> > > >
> > > > I think the following code may be more IE friendly:
> > > >
> > > > if (window.console && window.console.error) {
> > > > ...
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > On 9/12/07, Bertrand, Shawn R
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm getting error generated from the first line of the following
> > > > function
> > > > in
> > > > > Common1_0_2.js:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > TrRequestQueue._logError=function(a118)
> > > > >
> > > > > {
> > > > >
> > > > > if(console&&console.error)
> > > > >
> > > > > console.error(arguments);
> > > > >
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This is running in IE 6. Is this console object related to the
> > > > Acrobat
> > > > > console window?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Shawn
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
