Well, that and at the time, it seemed like JUL would let us do everything SL4J claimed to do. But as I stated earlier, the theoretical promises of JUL pluggability didn't live up to the real use conditions.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > When we took the vote two years ago, I at least didn't really > understand the need. > > Someone did bring up that point, but as a group we felt that > reinventing the wheel didn't make a lot of sense. SL4J was new, and > I for one didn't understand the advantages of using it. > > If we were to vote again today, I would be strongly in favor of using > SL4J as the logging mechanism. > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Ertio Lew <ertio...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why doesn't Myfaces allows the flexibility to plug in your desired logging >> SL4J implementation instead of restricting users to JUL/ Commons logging or >> otherwise incurring the overheads of using bridgeHandlers etc ?! >> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Did you ever say something you really regretted? >>> >>> I really regret saying that I strongly preferred JUL over SL4J on the >>> logging vote two years back[1]. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200906.mbox/%3c8f985b960906060447g30bb216ew62102b39be2a1...@mail.gmail.com%3E >>> >>> I am currently using the SLF4JBridgeHandler for JUL during >>> development, and incurring the performance hits. >>> >>> Barring other events, my plans are to default back to JUL logging for >>> production. >>> >>> How are other people handling this? I know at the time of the >>> discussion many people were switching to SL4J or still using log4j or >>> JCL, all of which would have the same performance issues. >>> >>> Is it time to revisit our logging yet again, now that we know the >>> theoretical flexibility of JUL didn't live up to the practical reality >>> of using it? >>> >>> slf4j and myfaces >>> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200906.mbox/%3c2332f63b0906050818q6c74e615u2edc7cc2ec9f5...@mail.gmail.com%3E >>> >>> [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging >>> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200906.mbox/%3c2332f63b0906091132y10cd0dadu4eb4a36dda6ae...@mail.gmail.com%3E >>> >>> [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0 >>> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200910.mbox/%3cf6c92360909301905g104297a5m3bba5fb3d057...@mail.gmail.com%3E >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2378 >>>
