> Thought this might be of interest even if OT. > You might want to see this discussion: http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/02/199203&from=rss
And especially this link: http://www.archivum.info/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2008-08/msg00757.html In summary, OOo ODF documents will not be compatible with MSO ODF documents. And that's fine: it's be cause of incomplete specifications on the part of ODF and bugs in OOo. MSO formats have a reference implementation: MSO itself. ODF has no reference implementation, and OOo is _not_ a reference implementation by any means. Due to MSO's foothold in the field, it _may_ be wise for OOo to follow MSO's example in ODF implementation. That is, to use MSO as the reference implementation. Thoughts? -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
