> In as much as microsoft had to _deliberatly_ and _willfully_ write > their ODF filter to be incompatible with _every_ ODF implementation > out there and that they had to willfuly, and deliberately ignore the > ODF specificaitons, to suggest that it will aid the deployment is > procl9aming "I AM A >
MS did not ignore the ODF specifications, in fact, considering the known OOo bugs in ODF implementation it may well be that MSO is more ODF compliant than OOo. MS simply did not make the non-specified parts of ODF behave like OOo does. What did you expect? -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
